Quantcast
Channel: VMware Communities: Message List - vRealize Operations Manager
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 14433

Re: policy section 3b: useable capacity thresholds. If there are 4 hosts, would a 25% threshold = N+1

$
0
0

hmmm ... thank you for the reply, but now like many of the controls in vcops, I find myself wondering just what those words mean!

 

"First, I note that you have the HA option selected - doing this will automatically use your cluster HA settings for the reserve of CPU and memory capacity (so in your case you are really reserving 50% not 25%)."


We do not use HA admission control (just don't find it that useful) - but I don't understand what "so in your case you are really reserving 50% not 25%" could possibly mean? There are 4 hosts in the cluster. We try to maintain an N+1 capability, which would mean essentially each host has 25-33% excess capacity, so that if one goes down, all the workload can run. Where do you get 50%?


Also you said:


"The reservation levels are, in my opinion, better for making sure that you have a buffer for unplanned growth than for HA."


Huh? Yes, that is what we want - we would like vCOPs to let us know, when our actual useable capacity is close to not being N+1 - we don't expect vCOPs to have any role in actual HA situations, but we want it's capacity forecasting to understand that "N+1" is what we consider "at capacity" so that we need to scale up (or move workload to another cluster) ...


It seems hard to believe that what I am asking for is so difficult, as the notion of N+1 is fundamental to resource planning of a virtual infrastructure ....




Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 14433

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>